Please sign in to post.

3 week Italy Itinerary

Hey all. I made some changes after my last post.

My boyfriend and I (upper 30s and early 40s) are going to spend the last 3 weeks of September in Italy. Neither of us have traveled in Italy before. We will have a car most of the time. 3 weeks seems like such a long time but of course is not. We are looking to hit up a mix of the top sites with some more out of the way places with a mix of city and not. We love good food and are very active. We will hit up some museums/historical sites and will do very little shopping. We are not budget travelers but are trying to keep costs under control. That being said we are willing to spend money on experiences that are worth it.

Here is the plan I have narrowed things down to. Any thoughts? Seem reasonable? Any recommendations to improve the itinerary? I know I am spending only 3 nights in most places. Overall, we are not wanting to spend tons of time in the places that will be very heavy with tourists)

day 1: arrive in Venice at 0755a
day 2: Venice
Day 3: pick up car and drive to the Val di Gardena region (hike and mountain bike while there)
Day 4: Val Gardena
Day 5: Val Gardena
Day 6: Val Gardena
Day 7: drive to Florence (park car outside of city, and stay in city)
Day 8: Florence
Day 9: Florence
Day 10: Drive to San Venanzo (friends mom rented a villa, staying with them and exploring the region)
Day 11: San Venanzo
Day 12: San Venanzo
Day 13: San Venanzo'
Day 14: Drive to Rome (return car)
Day 15: Rome
Day 16: Rome
Day 17: Rome
Day 18: Train to Puglia (trying to figure out our home base, probably 2 nights in Matera?) (get new rental car)
Day 19: Puglia
Day 20: Puglia
Day 21: Puglia
Day 22: fly or train to Rome (maybe arrive later and stay near airport)
Day 23: Fly out at 0730 from Rome

An alternative option is take out Puglia and spend more time in the north, possibly Bologna and San Marino areas

Posted by
1986 posts

(Did this topic reset somehow?)

I love Venice and would recommend you spend more time but the time you're spending there should let you know if it's for you. If hiking and outdoor exploring are your main interest then it is probably not your city.

You might think about dropping the car closer to Val Gardena - say Bolzano or Trento - and then train to Florence since you really don't want a car there and then pick one up on your way out of Florence. As others have suggested you should also drop the car after Matera as soon as you get back to a city since rental cars are an expensive burden and train travel is fast and efficient.

Naples is a huge and extremely busy city while Salerno is a small city (by US standards) and is more adjacent to nature, Pompeii, Paestum, and Naples is also 35 minutes away by train. There are also buses and ferries to Amalfi Coast if that interests you.

Generic driving advice: Be sure you get an IDP before you leave the states for everyone who might drive, read up on ZTLs before you leave and before you drive into new towns and add at least 25% to Google drive times for rural roads.

Have a great trip,
=Tod

Posted by
9903 posts

One day in Venice is NOT enough, at least add a day.
San Venanzo is in Umbria, which is a great province to visit. I recommend visiting Gubbio, Perugia, Spoleto, Assisi and Orvieto.
Puglia is OK, but at the south of Italy, some distance from Rome. I suggest that you pass on Puglia for this trip. Instead, spend more time in Tuscany (Lucca, Siena, Pisa and San Gimigancio) or the Naples-Sorrento-Capri-Pompeii-Amalfi Coast area.

Posted by
67 posts

I changed my plans so I redid the post but now I am questioning everything again. I was going to do Puglia and somewhere around Naples but I thought I was stretching myself too thin so we talked about it and picked one. This is one of the most difficult trips I have ever planned. I want to go everywhere but can't of course. We have that time in San Venanzo already set. We generally don't want to be surrounded my tons of people all the time and I have always dreamed of an Italian road trip.

We almost didn't do Venice at all but decided to start the trip there when flying into Venice made sense. We have a jet lagged day and a less jet lagged day there in the current itinerary.

Posted by
905 posts

I also recommend all the places in Umbria noted by Geovagriffith.
If you keep Puglia, and if your flights are not set, maybe see if you could fly out of Bari or Brindisi instead of backtracking to Rome.
If you drop Puglia, rather than adding a new region such as Bologna, I suggest that you could easily enjoy an additioanl day or more in any or all of your previous stops, especially Venice but also Tuscany and/or Dolomites.

Posted by
9536 posts

I would go to Florence directly after Venice. Agree with others’ comment - Venice amount of time is SO short! Usually a 1-day stop, especially with jet lag, equals people not liking lovely Venice.

Take the fast train to Florence and skip renting a car until heading to Val Gardena. Now you can arrive in the center of Florence by train and not waste time dealing with parking the car outside Florence & reduce rental car $.

I love the Puglia region - going this year for the third time. Your itinerary made me sigh. : ( I’m having a problem narrowing mine down to a week in that area. This will sound radical to some of our forum, but I would take some of the days from Rome and give them to the Puglia region. You very likely will be back in Rome on a future trip. I would place your days in Rome at the end of the itinerary.

You will likely be going to the main cities in the Puglia region where you don’t necessarily need a car. That will save you more $$.

Posted by
9536 posts

Just saw your update now. With your additional comments I would do two full days in Venice, two in Florence, head to the Tuscan valley, and I would end with just a couple of days in Rome. Enjoy Puglia at your pace with the few extra days added, : )

It’s very easy to do the Top 3 (V, F, R) with additional days during a future trip, and it sounds like your current priority is the less busy locations.