Please sign in to post.

Two Week Trip --> Ireland or Ireland + London?

I'm planning a two week trip in late May/early June, specific dates flexible around optimal flight prices. I've been to London before but many years ago. It's pretty low in terms of my European travel wish list. My travel partner has not been to London, but it's very high on his list. We both very much want to take in Ireland.

Ireland is a given, and our plan is 2-3 days in Dublin, then renting a car and driving the southern coast to hit Cork, Dingle, Cliffs of Moher and possibly Galway (as well as any high priority spots based on research yet to be completed - my RS Ireland guidebook has been ordered). We do not want to be rushed, as both sightseeing and relaxing along the way are definite priorities.

I'm seeking feedback on whether our time would be better spent savoring Ireland over the two weeks or whether we can still take in our preferred sites in a relaxed manner and hop over to London for a couple of days with a potential day trip to Bath in our two week window. Or would London/Bath best be enjoyed on a separate trip (acknowledging that a return to the UK would be a slim chance, given that our European wish list is quite long and we'd likely opt for Switzerland and Italy as destinations on a future trip). I really want to accomodate my travel partner's desire to explore London, but we're both in agreement that we don't want it to short change our experience of Ireland.

I also welcome must-see spots that I've overlooked on our proposed Ireland itinerary above. We will definitely be skipping the interior and Northern Ireland, so I'm seeking tips on our existing road trip path on the southern and western coasts.

Thanks in advance. Happy travels!

Posted by
15781 posts

Since you don't see yourselves getting to the UK for at least a few years and London is high on your travel partner's list, it's probably politic to include at least 3 days there. You can see a good deal of Ireland in a week.

Fitting in Bath is pushing it, though. You'll use 1/2 day getting from Ireland to London. Hmmm - just looked at rome2rio.com - you could fly from Dublin to Bristol, then a short train ride to Bath, spend the night and train to London the next day. The first time I went to Bath, it was beautiful in the sunshine. The second time it was rainy and not very pretty at all. Give all that, I'd skip Bath - you'll be happier spending the extra day in London or Ireland.

Posted by
8 posts

Chani - Thank you so much! I agree that a couple of days in London with a side trip to Bath is too aggressive. I was hoping to fit in some sites that I hadn't seen before if adding London to the Ireland itinerary. I also want to look into the Bristol option if we can allocate a few days to England. I appreciate your input.

Posted by
2774 posts

I've been to Ireland twice -- both times for short trips of 11 days. I felt I got a pretty good taste of Ireland, but would have loved more time. I feel sure you will be sorry to leave London so soon. On the other hand, you will have enough time to get to know the country if you want to leave 3 or 4 days for London. I would suggest no more than two days in Dublin, especially if you go to London. London has way more to offer than Dublin, which is one of my least favorite large cities in Europe. In fact, I would be tempted to skip Dublin if you go to London. Start in London, spend 3-4 days there, then fly to Shannon and spend all your time on the southwest and west coast. You can fly home from Shannon. That would be a good compromise.

Posted by
317 posts

Greetings from Ireland!

Sounds like it'll be a great trip. London is always worth a visit. Wasn't it Samuel Johnson who said
"when a man is tired of London, he is tired of life; for there is in London all that life can afford."

Your Ireland itinerary sounds good, I'd include the North however, even if its only a day trip to Belfast (and perhaps also the Giants Causeway). The North would be in my top 3 must-sees. Along with the Dingle peninsula.

Dublin is also a must-see, I think its essential you don't skip it. Its our capital city and full of history and the heartbeat of this Nation. I occasionally hear American travellers say they didnt enjoy Dublin and were glad to get out, or even worse "its just like any other big city". I honestly believe that if thats your feeling of Dublin then you've see the wrong parts (maybe spent all the time in the centre and in around Temple Bar) or you have seen it with the wrong people. You don't have to spend long there, but if you wish to have a full cultural and historical appreciation of my Island, then its a must-see even for a day or two.

Your RS guidebook will be a big help when it arrives, very detailed on Ricks favourite areas and full of information.

If you care for any more of my opinions just drop me a line.

Le meas/with respect
Stephen McPhilemy
Ireland Tour-Guide

Posted by
8 posts

Thanks so much! I'm personally one that does not love huge cities. They are must-see's, of course, but it's not where I've truly savored Europe. Prague is my favorite larger city. My absolute favorites from past visits to Europe are Cinque Terre (back in 1999 before it became more traveled), Gimmelwald and Delft. I'd be open to skipping Dublin, but my travel partner definitely would not. We'll probably give it 2 days.

If we skip England, I will definitely be checking out Belfast!

I think I'll outline a few itineraries:
London + Bath plus south/west Ireland via Shannon (no Dublin)
Ireland only (including sufficent time in Dublin, small towns and perhaps Belfast)
Dublin, south/west Irealnd + London (dilluting Ireland a bit and not getting away to Bath)

Once I get some more structure around the above possibilities, I'll ultimately let my significant other (his first trip to Europe) decide on which itinerary he prefers. Guidebook should arrive tomorrow and I can't wait to dig in.

I continue to welcome ideas/thoughts. Many thanks!

Posted by
131 posts

Please check your inbox. I sent a private message.