Please sign in to post.

Old Trinity Library has removed all books

This is what the link says: "The Old Library Redevelopment Project is underway
As part of our conservation efforts, all of the books within The Long Room have been removed from the shelves. We are undergoing a historic project in the Old Library to safeguard the 18th century building and preserve its precious collections."
Should we still go see it in Sept?

Posted by
8398 posts

Really up to you. For me, the Book of Kells display was a disappointment. Others have shared similar sentiments, but then went on to gush over the library. So, what is it that makes the library interesting? Is the books? The building itself? The combination? What was the appeal for you?

I worry that this is one of those locations that people go to because everyone says that they should, not because they actually find it that interesting.

Posted by
6525 posts

The Long Room itself is beautiful and very interesting, if it's open. It will look strange without all the books, but still worth seeing, as is the Book of Kells downstairs. What priority to give these sights depends on your interests and available time. I'm glad I saw both, and sorry I didn't have more time to take a student-led tour of Trinity College.

I think they told us (last year) that each book was getting a cover, which meant not all the books would fit back into the shelves. But they need to preserve them and conserve the room and building.

Posted by
1857 posts

Checking the website it says "Kindly note that all the books within The Long Room have been removed from the shelves. Your ticket gives you admission to the Book of Kells and Old Library."

So a lot depends on how much you wanted to see the long room or if the the Book of Kells is the most important. Just because it features on everyone's tick list doesn't make it compulsory!

Posted by
427 posts

We took the student-led Trinity College tour and really enjoyed it. We bypassed the Book of Kells (this was 2015). Just felt like it was over hyped and we just didn't have the interest or the patience for the line. Must have been even longer lines the last few years.