Please sign in to post.
Posted by
7054 posts

I read it the other day. It just goes to show how much accessibility and direct flights and a model that essentially funnels people through using free stopovers and budget fares has such an outsize force on tourism to rather remote places. If Iceland does indeed have a boom/ bust economy built on tourism, it's probably best that they diversify a bit more. Tourism is a two-edged sword. The business model for WOW and Norwegian has not proven to be sustainable in the long run. Norwegian is pruning its network as we speak to keep afloat, we'll have to see what happens to them.

Posted by
2916 posts

If Iceland does indeed have a boom/ bust economy built on tourism, it's probably best that they diversify a bit more.

That was my first reaction, but then I thought: With what?

Posted by
7054 posts

So not sure why WOW's disappearance made such a difference

WOW was only one of 2 airlines that had direct flights from major US airline markets (NY, LA, Chicago, DC Region), so of course it would have an impact on the tourism traffic once those suddenly disappeared. Plus all those WOW employees are now unemployed.

As far as diversification, they have a very well-educated and young but very small population. They've been relying on fishing (cod), aluminum smelting (done by the only immigrants to Iceland) and tourism. They tried some risky banking products but those led to their fiasco in 2008. They have a great music and cultural scene but it's largely local. They excel at using geothermal energy but they are very uniquely situated to take advantage in that - I don't know what byproducts are feasible. Their largest trading partner is probably the UK, if I had to guess.

Posted by
8242 posts

Norwegian is pruning its network as we speak to keep afloat, we'll have to see what happens to them.

Yeah it sucks they pulled out of the Chicago to London or Barcelona operations

Posted by
921 posts

After talking to many Icelanders, especially those involved in the tourism industry, there seemed to be a collective sigh of relief with the demise of WOW. The feeling was that their low fares attracted too many visitors that saw only a low fare, knew little about Iceland, and traveled woefully unprepared for either the conditions or the real expense. Such were not a purposeful visitor but ones who were only attracted to what they thought would be a cheap vacation to an exotic land.

I came away with the impression that many are prepared for the "hit" to visitor numbers as they feel that going forward the quality of visitors will be much better that they quantity.

Posted by
5 posts

Interesting take. I would hate to be subjected to all the tourists all day everyday! I totally agree, I saw many a tourist totally unprepared, taking silly risks for a photo, going off pathways in treacherous conditions. A pet peeve of mine when I was in Iceland for my last trip in winter was coming around a corner to find a car just "abandoned" in the road while people were taking photos. Nearly hit a car when it was snowing as they had just parked in the road. And this was the ring road, so loads of traffic.