Please sign in to post.

Prioritize King's Castles or Rothenburg?

I will be in Germany for ~12 days at the end of September, beginning of October. After spending 3 days in Munich with side trip to Salzburg, I have 3 days in my itinerary that I'm trying to sort out. Can you help me decide on the following two options?

1st option is to spend two nights in Fussen with visits to King's Castles. The third day is spent driving the Romantic Road and sleeping in Rothenburg (following this, I was planning on going to Nuremburg, then to Berlin).

2nd option is to spend one night in Fussen with visits to King's Castles. Days two and three are spent driving the Romantic Road with two nights accommodation in Rothenburg. Do you recommend 2 nights Fussen, 1 night Rothenburg or 1 night Fussen, 2 nights Rothenburg? Thanks!

Posted by
691 posts

It's personal preference, and I'm sure you could enjoy either. We stayed one night in Rothenburg (arrived around 2:00 I think) and had plenty of time to explore, walk most of the wall, shop and eat. I'm sure we would have enjoyed 2 nights as well. We also stayed 2 nights in Fussen (on the RS My Way Alpine tour). We enjoyed walking to the castles and seeing the outsides (but chose not to go in), and taking much more of a hike on the way back to Fussen. I'd say you should consider how much time you want to spend at the castles.

Posted by
16895 posts

I'd say that these are some reasons to spend the extra night in Fuessen: Around Fuessen, if you want to see more than just the two closest castles, the you'll be driving, e.g., to reach the Wieskirche, Linderhof palace, a luge ride, or maybe Oberammergau. During your visit to Rothenburg ob der Tauber, I assume you'll stay just within that one small, easily walkable town. After Rothenburg, your drive to Nuremburg is short - only about one hour - so the time you depart Rothenburg can be very flexible.

Posted by
3 posts

Thank you padams and Laura! Great advice. I think I will be leaning to the 2 nights in Fussen, 1 night in Rothenburg option based on your recommendations. Thanks!

Posted by
7072 posts

Depending on what it is you hope to see, I might vote for neither.
Neuschwanstein draws 1.6 million visitor per year. To get 7,000 visitors per day through the place, tours leave every 5 minutes and last only 30 minutes. While most palaces in Germany get mostly German visitors, N'stein and the other kings castles are a mecca mostly for international tourists - well more than half are from China, the USA, and other foreign countries. I recently read this comment in German from one of N'stein's tour guides in Germany's DW online.

Schlossführer Patrick Korb (32) hat festgestellt, dass Besucher aus unterschiedlichen Erdteilen auch unterschiedliche Erwartungen hegen. „Amerikaner haben oft das Bild von der perfekten Mittelalterburg im Kopf. Wenn man ihnen dann sagt, dass das Schloss zu einer Zeit gebaut wurde, als in Chicago schon die ersten Hochhäuser entstanden, wollen sie das manchmal kaum glauben.

(Rough translation - Americans, like other foreigners, often base a visit to N'stein on misunderstandings - Americans often picture N'stein as a medieval castle and often do not believe guides like Korb when they're told it was built around the same time as Chicago's first skyscrapers.) N'stein was given a fake castle exterior but isn't remotely a castle - it was built as a royal residence.

This DW article in English explains the uniquely tourist-heavy N'stein experience.

Rothenburg is similar. The math tells the story - 2.5 million visitors per year in a town of 10,000 locals who serve them food, sell them trinkets and clean their rooms. Half the overnight guests are foreigners.

It's almost as though there's some conspiracy afoot that conspires to shuttle all Americans and other foreign tourists to Rothenburg and the King's castles. Yet Germany has hundreds of real castles and modern palaces you can visit... If you're looking for a faux castle - or destinations where Germans are outnumbered, and English is language of menus and business - then Rothenburg and the King's Castles may suit you. OTOH Munich itself has a fabulous palace you might have overlooked - Nymphenburg, King Ludwig's birthplace. It includes a main palace, satellite palaces, a carriage museum, a porcelain museum, and gardens. You'll find some international tourists of course, but their numbers are much smaller and you won't be rushed through in a milking line. And there are genuine medieval castles you might visit as well in Bavaria, including Pappenheim, Coburg, Burghausen, and Harburg; a trip to Salzburg and nearby Werfen would provide access to other castles including the impressive Hohenwerfen (film site for the late-60's move "Where Eagles Dare") where there's also a falconry show.

Posted by
3 posts

Russ - thank you for your frank perspective. It was actually very refreshing hearing this; although I recognize that the King's Castles and Rothenburg are considered top tourist draws, it seems to me too much of faux tourist draws. I also appreciated the reviewer who suggested the Romantic Road is also underwhelming. Given your input and much thought, I've changed my plans to go to Salzburg (and likely Berchtesgaden) instead.