We have 19 nights in France, mid Oct to early Nov, fly in & out of CDG & have debated on where else to go besides Paris- where we expect to spend a week or so. I realize in & out of CDG isn't optimal but that's what we have. Basic & easy would be Paris & Nice but I think it may be better to save southern France for its own vacation & better time of year (?). In northern France, Normandy/Dinan/Mont St Michel & Alsace are high on our list which are opposite sides of France. I welcome thoughts on the Paris/Nice vs west/east trip but am basically wondering if we did west/east, what would be the best way time wise & money wise? More driving or mixture of driving & trains?
Our thoughts:
Spend the first couple of days in Paris, train to Dinan & stay 2 nights. Rent a car in Dinan & drive to Mont St Michel & St Malo while there. Afterwards, head to Normandy where Juno is a must. Stay in Caen or Rouen 2 nights & see other beaches or maybe Honfleur. Drop the car in Rouen, train back to Paris , spend time in Paris, then train to Reims (1 night), then to either Colmar/Strasbourg for 3 nights then train back to Paris from Strasbourg.
Or does it make more sense to spend first night in Paris, train to Dinan (2 nights), rent a car, see the places mentioned above (2 nights), drive to Dijon or Lyon, spend 2-3 nights, then drive to Alsace (2-3 nights), drive to Reims (drop the car there), then either stay a night or train to Paris?
Any combo of the two? Another tid-bit to know regarding traveling days: 3-6 hours every 3-4 days would be okay for how we like to travel.
Thanks for any input!!