Bonjour!
I'm planning a trip in October to France.
"I" am a 53 year old man with similarly aged wife. We'll (hopefully) have our 3 adult sons and 1 adult girlfriend (ages 24-26-28).
All the 'kids' have been to France before on ETF tours and have been to Paris.
My wife and I have never been to France and therefore never been to Paris.
In trying to plan the trip I was thinking to head to Nice first as nobody in our family has been there. I know you can never visit Paris too often, but the middle son and gf just visited back from a trip in January. So...for those of you with grown adult children if you're like us you know how difficult it can be to get the kids to come along even when you're paying so was hoping to lure them with someplace different :-)
I am trying to decide if we should spend our entire time in Nice, or if we should take the train to Paris with a stop along the way in Lyon, or just direct to Paris?
I want to visit Paris for selfish reasons, but understand this will not be our ONLY time in France. I know we'll have plenty of other opportunities, so don't want to pack too much into too short a time...which I did (and don't want to do again!) when we visited Italy here,
What I'm wondering is if this is a lousy idea:
3 nights in Nice
2 nights in Lyon
3 nights in Paris
I am interested in Lyon as we're all (pardon me) "foodies" and I'm believing the train ride straight to Paris from Nice would be nicer if we broke it up with a stop in Lyon...but after looking at times maybe I'm wrong and the getting on and off twice would make it a bigger pain in the neck:
Nice to Paris = 5 hours and 40 minutes
VS
Nice to Lyon = 4 hours and 30 minutes
Lyon to Paris = 2 hours
Total = 6 hours and 30 minutes...one hour (more or less) longer than straight to Paris
Thoughts? Insights? Any help is appreciated!