So much to see, so little time! We are an Australian family planning a trip in September for my husband and I (30's), my mother-in-law (60's) and our (due any day now!!) baby, who will be about 5 months old. It is all of our first trip to France, and we cannot decide between Normandy and Burgundy. So far, our trip looks like:
London - 5 nights
* Possibly Bayeux - 4 nights
Paris - 5 nights
* Possibly Beaune - 4 nights
St-Remy-de-Provence - 5 nights (note: we will focus on that area, not head to the coast)
Onwards to Spain
If we choose Normandy, I am inclined to catch the train to Lille and then spend the afternoon driving at our own pace across to Bayeux as I don't fancy trying to change train stations in Paris with the baby and all of our gear. That would give us 3 days, in which we would visit Mont St Michel, self-tour the D-Day beaches, and visit Bayeux, Honfleur or any other towns we have time for. I understand that we would get more out of a tour of the beaches, however don't think it is realistic with the baby.
Alternatively, if we choose Burgundy, I am thinking of catching the train from Paris to Dijon, visiting Dijon before picking up a car and heading to Beaune. Wine tasting wouldn't be a big attraction for our group, though we love the beauty of the vineyards. We would spend our time visiting towns and chateau in the area.
The key point for us is choosing a place that contrasts and complements the rest of our trip. As far as I can tell, we can't make a 'wrong' choice - either region will be lovely - however need to decide somehow! I like the idea of breaking up London and Paris and have the impression that Normandy is more 'different' to Provence, but we lose most of a day in travel. Burgundy involves less travel time, however I am concerned that we will be seeing a lot of nice towns and countryside in Provence and would like a bit of variety.
Thanks in advance for any advice.
Sarah