Good morning everyone. It's a beautiful day in Northern California but I am of course dreaming of ... France.
We are planning a trip for October. Normandy/Brittany for the first chunk, then to Paris (we have been to the latter many times). Initially we were to be based in Rouen for the first half of the Normandy/Brittany portion - but for various reasons we are now looking at either Bayeux or Caen. (I have wrung my hands plenty over that one; but we are now set on either Bayeux or Caen.)
Keeping in mind that these things are highly subjective, I would love to hear thoughts on Bayeux vs Caen. We will arrive via train from Paris, then spend a day poking around whichever town we end up in. We will then rent a car (booked in advance, of course) to explore the region. I have looked up travel times so I know what we're getting into. But over the course of a couple days or so we want to see Etretat, Honfleur, Le Havre, a couple others.
I have read up a bit on car rentals in both places, and it looks like Caen is much easier. HOWEVER they are close enough that even if we choose Bayeux we can take a short train ride back to Caen to grab the car. (Or will this be more of a hassle than I realize?)
So I guess I'm hoping for some general thoughts on one town vs the other. Including how easy it will be to deal with the rental car and driving in and out of the town to explore the region.
Beyond that, I would also of course love any specific recommendations on things to do, can't-miss villages, restaurants, etc., etc. (Note: I am already aware that the Bayeux Tapestry will not be around.)
After Bayeux/Caen we will drive to Dinan and spend another couple days or so. Saint-Malo, Mont Saint-Michel, etc. Then return the car in Rennes or Caen, and take the train to Paris.
Needless to say we are very excited! We are seasoned travelers and have been to other parts of France (+ Paris many times). But this will be our first trek to Normandy/Brittany.
Any thoughts would be most appreciated! Thanks
--Ben P., Oakland, CA