Ok...finally finalizing our plans for our first trip to London. It is helpful to have people who know advise on matters that are a bit unclear. I have read many conflicting opinions about the London Pass. I'm confused as ever about what is best in our particular case. I thought I'd put it out there for all my fellow travelers to see if there is a consensus of opinion.
I see that the Pass covers a lot of attractions, but many of them we don't want to do (aquarium, wax museum, etc.). We are there for the major sites as first time visitors to London. This is my list of what we want to do for sure (I'll try to leave out anything that is free, but forgive me if I miss one): Westminster Abbey, Royal Mews, St. Paul's Cathedral, Tower of London, London Eye, Hop On/Off bus, Churchill War rooms, Kensington Palace, possibly Hampton Court Palace, if time allows. We will be in London 5 days.
So...are we better off buying individual tickets for each of these sites (for 2 adults and 2 students) or going with the London Pass? One important question I would like to have answered is if we buy individual tickets for everything rather than the London Pass, would we be missing out on the "fast track entry" that the London Pass offers? It sounds like we would. Is "fast track entry" available for people without the London Pass? I've heard a bit about the 2 for 1 offers and I'm starting my reading on that. Obviously, whatever gets us in the quickest is the most desirable. I'd rather pay a little more if the experience is a lot nicer or faster.
Thanks for your thoughts