We've got a blitz trip across the UK coming up (late June/early July) and I'm nearly done nailing down my itinerary (I think). Overall the pace of the trip is pretty aggressive (we're used to that). Right now I have two nights and one full day each in York and Edinburgh (arrive late afternoon, relax in the evening hours, have the next day for sightseeing, sleep there again, then move on the next day).
York is our stopping point between Southern/Central England and points north. From Edinburgh, we will be heading up to the highlands (briefly) and making short visits out to Lewis and Orkney (on our nearly-three week trip we will be spending a week of it in Scotland).
I have managed to free up one more day by (painfully) cutting out another location that was more out-of-the-way. So I have another day I can now distribute to either York or Edinburgh (but not both). I figure a second full day (and a third night) in one of these cities would be worthwhile (plenty to do and see), and would allow for a less-grueling trip (we do have a fair number of one-night-stands, and I know those wear you down).
If you had to pick one of these two towns for a second full day, which would you choose?
FWIW, Rick says, "even on a 10 day trip through Britain, it [York] deserves 2 nights and a day". He says Edinburgh rates two full days and 3 nights. Do you agree?
Thanks!