Please sign in to post.

Worst Places to Visit in London (without a malware link!)

Hello fellow travellers,
Everybody knows London is a great city with many things to see and do. But, some parts of this big city are not very nice for tourists. I wanted to start a talk where we can share our ideas about the worst places to visit in London. Remember, different people have different opinions, so this list is not the same for everyone. Here's my take on places that might not live up to the London dream.
In these place, I haven’t personally visited, but through research, I found out that.
1. Camden Market: While it's popular, the market can be overly crowded and pricey. It's lost some of its authentic charm due to commercialization.
2. Leicester Square: A tourist trap with overpriced theaters and restaurants. It's often crowded, and you can find better dining options elsewhere.
3. Oxford Street: Great for shopping, but the crowded sidewalks and lack of character can be overwhelming. Consider other shopping districts like Covent Garden.
4. Piccadilly Circus: Another tourist hub, but not much to see apart from neon lights and crowds. Head to nearby Trafalgar Square for more culture.
5. Baker Street: Made famous by Sherlock Holmes, but there's not much here related to the detective. It's often underwhelming for fans.
6. Harrods: A luxurious department store, but it's expensive and often crowded. Not the best place for shopping unless you're a high-end shopper.
7. Brick Lane: Once a trendy spot, it's lost its charm due to gentrification and can be crowded with tourists and overpriced vintage stores.
8. Ripper Tours: Some tours related to Jack the Ripper can be sensationalized and underwhelming for history enthusiasts.
9. Platform 9¾ at King's Cross Station: It's just a photo spot, often with a long queue. Not much to see beyond the Harry Potter photo op.
10. London Dungeon: It's more of a theme park experience than a historical attraction. Not suitable for those seeking authentic history.
These are just my opinions, and your experiences may differ. What places have you found to be less appealing in London, and why? Let's share our insights and help fellow travelers make the most of their visit!
Feel free to comment with your thoughts or additions to the list.

Posted by
33148 posts

perhaps the OP could mention that this is a copy of somebody else's words

Posted by
985 posts

Sorry Nigel, I was assuming that everyone would have seen the previous post.

Whilst they are not my words I do agree with the great majority of them. My only comment was that whilst Brick Lane itself is not what it was and is not the place to go for a curry, the general area is interesting, a good economic area to stay and Spitalfields next to it is good for shopping and eating.

Posted by
7673 posts

I think you could add the London Eye. Will admit that I have avoided it on half dozen or more trips to London, but to pay that much (25 to 45 GBP) for a view and a twirl on the wheel, it seemed wise to avoid.

Posted by
6861 posts

Luckily none of the above are places that I have on my list to see. I especially agree about Piccadilly Circus. I found that out on my first trip to London back in 1996.

Posted by
4253 posts

I'm assuming that point #1 about the Camden Market is specifically talking about the market and not the neighbourhood in general. I liked the area. Highlights for me was seeing the apartment building that Charles Dickens lived in in 1823 when he was still a boy. Apparently he used this home as the setting for Tiny Tim's home in A Christmas Carol. The other thing that made an impression on me was a block of buildings from the 1800's at each end, but the middle of the block was post WW2 because it had been turned to rubble due to bombings during the war. It's the first time that I'd noticed that in London and made the war seem more real.

The market was crowded and if I remember correctly it was like a rat maze inside. But we felt very much like we were in London because we didn't notice a lot of tourists.

Posted by
5361 posts

London Dungeon: It's more of a theme park experience than a historical attraction ...

Since that is what it is marketed as, alongside the other Merlin attractions in the same area it shouldn't be that surprising. In its very early days up to the mid 1980s it was somewhat more educational but it was always more of the Horrible Histories type than seeking accuracy. It has been an "experience" for decades, ever since it stopped being free flow walk through. Was more atmospheric in its old location though.

Posted by
8825 posts

Over decades of London visits have been to all with the exception of the London Dungeon and the HP platform at Kings Cross.

Firm believer in freedom of choice though. If someone chooses to visit the Dungeon who am I to ask why?

When first timers ask me what are must sees and what to avoid I answer; See: theatre, Parliament Square, St Pauls, Tower of London, Bletchley Park, walk along the Thames Path, Harrod’s Food Hall, Greenwich, Highgate Cemetery, Liberty and enjoy a London Walk www.walks.com

What to avoid? Nothing. It’s London.

However, I do advise if truly wanting to see the Changing of the Guard at the Palace then stand at the intersection of Spur Road at Birdcage Walk and watch the Tower Guards band march from their barracks to the Palace.

I also advise to enjoy a pub lunch. Recommending such pubs as The Dove, The White Cross, Bank of England, Ye Olde Mitre and The Haven Arms. Each one in different London neighborhoods.

Posted by
985 posts

Of course anyone can go and do anything they want to as long as it's legal. But time and again we get asked on forums both what to see and see itineraries with the places above listed. There is not much point in having a forum for travel advice and people not being prepared to say what they wouldn't do as well as what they should.

Posted by
1605 posts

Next June I'm returning to London for a month, the first time since 2002 (or 2003?). I'll be hitting most of it on the list (not the Dungeon, the Platform or the Ripper thingy). According to the criteria above, every popular city contains numerous sites and areas which should be avoided. As Yoggi Berra might have said, "Nobody goes down Oxford Street anymore. There's too many people."

Posted by
2621 posts

The only reason I visit Camden Market is for a glorious restaurant called The Cheese Bar--I wandered the market once and that was enough for me. Oxford Street cannot be avoided if one makes a ritual pilgrimage to Liberty as I am wont to do, and there's a lovely pub called The Clachan nearby as well as John Lewis down the street...though I do love Covent Garden for the antiques market on Mondays, the London Transport Museum and the nearby book shops. If I stay at Baileys Hotel then I inevitably end up having at least one meal in my room or Hyde Park picnic from the fabulous food hall at Harrod's...and then there's the candy hall.

Posted by
985 posts

Liberty is on Regent St, not Oxford so it’s perfectly possible to miss the latter.

Posted by
4554 posts

This is an American expat in London who vlogs vigorously and constantly, and she has several videos about what to avoid

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C8JeYdsujtE

And yes avoid Leicester Square unless you're going to the theater, popped up from the Tube on a Saturday night and it was standing room only. Like Times Square on NYE.

Posted by
834 posts

I'd definitely still recommend Camden Market to most visitors. Yes, there's a lot of repetition between stalls, selling the same bongs / Che Guevara t-shirts / baggy tie-dye pants etc. but there's still more than a handful of artisan makers selling interesting bits and bobs.

The choice of street food is second only to Borough Market, and there's more places to sit.

On a nice day there's a cool scene of people hanging out by the Regents Canal from Camden Lock down. Bars around Camden Lock are a good place to enjoy a pint outdoors.

It isn't as authentically rock n' roll as it was 25 or 30 years ago. The stretch of the High Street from the tube station up to the market is like "Goth Blackpool".

Camden itself is an interesting, thriving borough. Lots of history, diverse geographically and demographically.

A fun way to get there is the 88 bus. It passes many central London landmarks before going to Camden.