Please sign in to post.

which one: Chatsworth, Howard, blenheim

I wish we had time to see all of them, but that’s just not possible. If I had to choose one, which would be the winner? I’m also open to other recommendations—as long as they’re along the route: areas around London, near Bath north to Oxford, the Cotswolds, up to the Peak District or Yorkshire.

Posted by
1577 posts

My order (not necessarily the preference of others): Blenheim, Chatsworth, Howard.

You probably can’t lose with any choice.

I like knowing something of family histories so Blenheim with the Churchill connection and Chatsworth with the Kennedy (Kathleen “Kick”) story sparked additional interest for me. Not necessary to enjoy the properties, however.

I would probably check the itinerary and see what works best time and distance wise.

Posted by
21 posts

'I would probably check the itinerary and see what works best time and distance wise.'

-- that's exactly what I am trying to optimize for: I originally have Chatsworth planned out, but I now realize that in order to make it, it would take a lot of extra driving and I would have limited time to visit other parts of the Peak District. So I started to question if it's worth the effort and time, and if it's better to replace it with Blenheim or Howard (if yes, which one). But then I read that Chatsworth is so replaceable and the quintessential English that can't be missed. Hence the original question here.

Posted by
1577 posts

Chatsworth is more out of the way. We detoured to get there like you are considering. Worth the detour to us. (But we could also include Blenheim in the same trip!).

Blenheim is my favorite because of the Churchill, Dukes of Marlborough connection. That will not resonate with all, but was an important factor in my visit.

If you would enjoy extensive grounds, Chatsworth would be a good bet.

Hard decisions- and rather personal. I’m curious what others think. I hope there is helpful commentary for you. One this trip and another on a return??

Posted by
9754 posts

What is your route, to and from where, if you say that Chatsworth is well out of your way?
Chatsworth is in the Peak District, or minutes out of it depending on definition. Yorkshire is a huge county. If you are going through the Yorkshire Dales you are not near Castle Howard, but if the North Yorkshire Moors then you are.

London, Bath, Oxford is already a dog leg of a journey.

Posted by
21 posts

I am still working on the route, roughly start from either Oxford or Bath, or vice versa. drive through 1 or 2 cotswolds villages (avoiding those popular ones though), either to Peak District (mainly for Chatsworth), or skipping it, to arrive York (or depending on the earlier route change, I might return the car earlier and take a train ride to York).

Posted by
492 posts

With the caveat that I haven't yet been to Castle Howard (tho am planning a trip there for July as it has just reopened), I would definitely vote for Chatsworth. It really is spectacular and the gardens are amazing. Blenheim is very nice as well but I think people may rate it more highly due to the Churchill connection. Visiting stately homes across the UK is one of my favourite weekend activities so I have seen many, and Chatsworth has been the best. However, I am sure you will have a good time whichever of these you choose.

Posted by
2680 posts

Castle Howard would be bottom of my list - there isn't as much to see there compared with the other two and it lacks the WOW factor.

Both Blenheim and Chatsworth are stunning and are surrounded by large and very grounds . Both deserve a full day. deserve a full day. To be honest it probably doesn't make a lot of difference which one you choose if you can only 'do' one - chose the one that best fits in with your itinerary.

Posted by
1517 posts

Purely on the basis of the building and grounds it has to be Chatsworth. If you are going between Oxford and the Cotswolds to Yorkshire then it is really not out of the way, other than a need to come off the motorway to get to it. Were it me I would go to Bath, then Oxford and Blenheim and then Chatsworth and spend what time you planned for the Cotswolds in the Peak District - much better in my view.

Posted by
9610 posts

I have not been to Blenheim Palace, but I have been both to Castle Howard and Chatsworth, and my vote would be for Chatsworth. For one thing, the scenery around there is just beautiful. I love the Peak District. And Chatsworth itself was so gorgeous. The grounds were not just beautiful but also really creative and unusual in some respects. And the house was phenomenal. I could’ve stayed there forever.

I really enjoyed the grounds of Castle Howard, but I think Chatsworth is just much more appealing and well worth a visit. And, when it’s over, you can stop in Bakewell and get a Bakewell tart! That’s a win-win!!! :-)

Posted by
21 posts

Thank you everyone for sharing your preferences—it looks like Chatsworth is winning the majority vote here. I was right on the edge of giving it up, but now I’m rethinking.

Were it me, I would go to Bath, then Oxford and Blenheim, and then Chatsworth, and spend the time you planned for the Cotswolds in the Peak District—much better in my view.” That sounds compelling, but realistically, this would require adding a full extra day to include Blenheim. So even if I skip the Cotswolds altogether, I wouldn’t actually free up time to explore more of the Peak District, which is a shame.

Interestingly, I asked three American friends who had been to both the Cotswolds and the Peak District, and all of them recommended prioritizing the Cotswolds if I had to choose. But when I searched on this forum and on TripAdvisor, the local experts overwhelmingly favor the Peak District. I just find that difference of opinion fascinating. It’s a pity I won’t have time to fully experience both on this trip—would’ve loved to form my own comparison!

Posted by
9610 posts

Interestingly, I asked three American friends who had been to both the Cotswolds and the Peak District, and all of them recommended prioritizing the Cotswolds if I had to choose...

That's really interesting. I've been to both, and while I enjoyed the Cotswolds, I really don't have any desire to go back. But I could definitely return (and hopefully will) to The Peak over and over again. I've been there twice (almost 30 years apart) and it's one of my favorite places in the UK. I think because it's a little rugged and wild; much more so than the pristine Cotswold (my opinion, of course). Another factor is that the Peak does not get near the American tourist travel that the Cotswolds does. I don't particularly care for traveling to places that are filled with other Americans, but again, that's me. :-)

Posted by
4189 posts

I have visited all three , and my choice would be Chatsworth , hands down !! The gardens , the beauty of the estate , the art , and the extensive history , and not least of all the splendid beauty of the Peak district . This fine PBS, one hour video, will introduce you to Chatsworth's history and charm - https://youtu.be/lF9qKPDg9sA?si=VwCEfnVPCtXTUdQ4

Posted by
9442 posts

My son just went to Castle Howard a few days ago and was very underwhelmed. Chatsworth would be my choice hands down.

Posted by
2680 posts

Another factor is that the Peak does not get near the American tourist travel that the Cotswolds does.

I think that may be part of the issue Mardeee. There are some Americam visitors who seem to be scared stiff of diverging from the standard itinerary. Maybe they worry that 'the folks back home' won't recognise the places they have visited and will criticise them for not doing England properly...

Posted by
9610 posts

I don't know, wasleys; you could be right. I wish Americans would realize what a special and beautiful place it is, although that could, of course, turn it into another Cotswolds, which I would hate.

Posted by
9442 posts

Mardee, keep it on the down-low so it’s not ruined for you… : )

Posted by
8990 posts

Blenheim Palace was awesome. Castle Howard was nice, but no where near Churchill's birthplace. Haven't been to Chatsworth.

Posted by
968 posts

Hi, If you’re interested in estates on a smaller scale that still have lovely gardens, I enjoyed Newby Hall in Yorkshire. Also Holker Hall, but that’s closer to the Lake District.

Feel free to toss tomatoes at me, but I found Chatsworth a bit overwhelming or maybe it’s just that it was crowded the day we were there. In other words, it’s impressive, but I’m disappointed that I didn’t care for it as much as I expected I would.

Posted by
21 posts

There are some Americam visitors who seem to be scared stiff of diverging from the standard itinerary. Maybe they worry that 'the folks back home' won't recognise the places they have visited and will criticise them for not doing England properly...

I don’t think that aligns with what’s on the minds of most American travelers. For most Americans who take the time to fly halfway around the world using their extremely limited and hard-earned vacation time, they’re typically seeking experiences they can’t easily find back home. Natural beauty — while certainly what the Peak District is known for — isn’t usually the main draw for this kind of trip, since many can find outstanding landscapes (albeit different) more easily and affordably near where they live.

Posted by
407 posts

If it was my choice, I'd pick Chatsworth House because of it's association with Pride and Prejudice. It was Pemberly in the 2005 movie! I'd love to see it one day. Loved the movie.