Please sign in to post.
Posted by
168 posts

Interesting to see how they do in 15 months, and then possibly get a longer deal to operate in London should they meet all the changes/requirements they needed to make.

Posted by
1589 posts

I would not say that Uber "Won". They had to agree to correct all the items that were the basis for the original license suspension.

Posted by
4007 posts

The New York Times actually said it. It is a big win because they now have 15 months to make whatever adjustments are necessary and people can have access to have a much cheaper alternative to black taxis. That is better than NOTHING. As I mentioned above, I hope Lyft expands into major European regions/cities because they are better than Uber.

Posted by
1069 posts

"people can have access to have a much cheaper alternative to black taxis."

They already had an alternative, minicabs (or to use an older term, private hire).

Posted by
4007 posts

When I took Uber before the rigamarole with the courts began, their fares were the cheapest around including comparing them with car services like Just Airports and minicabs. But that was a few years ago.

Posted by
5331 posts

The interesting thing to me was that when Uber initiated the court action it seemed out of belligerency. At the hearing though it was contrite. What a different a few months make … and a change in management.

Uber though is rather less different in the UK market than elsewhere, as in essence it operates as a personal hire vehicle intermediary with an app interface.