I think some museum staff had a bet amongst themselves along the lines of ''what is the silliest display we can put out that people will pay to see?"
To be fair to this work (which I haven't seen in person) it doesn't seem all that silly to me. The whole piece seems to be based around growing up in a Scottish-Asian family in the southside of Glasgow and I'd imagine the doily has some significance with that. The car is a replica of the Ford Escort her father drove when he first came from India. What really tickled me was the other work mentioned in the article; an old family photo blown up and embedded in a resin made of Irn Bru and rotti. Can't get much more Pollokshaws than that.
If you think that's silly, you'll love the work Martin Creed won the Turner Prize with in 2001. Work No. 227: The lights going on and off. Basically an empty room with the lights going on and off at five second intervals. I saw a later version with a slightly less intense interval a few years ago. He's also well known for Work No. 88 - A sheet of A4 paper crumpled into a ball and Work No. 79 Some Blu-Tack kneaded, rolled into a ball, and depressed against a wall. I have a lot of time for Martin Creed and his work. These early works might be silly, but if silly is absurd, that's what does it for me in art sometimes. I like that it is what it is what it is as far as the objects go. Completely literal. I also like his neon work and I've seen him sing his songs on stage. His exhibition at The Hayward in 2014 might be the best art exhibition I've ever been to. That featured a car too, Work 1686, a Ford Focus that could randomly open and close its doors, trunk and hood.
I suppose my car, with its array of bugs from 6 states splattered on the front could qualify as 'art'.
I suppose it could. My response when people say "But I could do that!" in response to an artwork would always be "Errr... but you didn't". Someone else did and made you say "But I could do that!" by doing it, so it becomes a bit of a moot point in that situation.