Please sign in to post.

Places to stay in London?

For several years, I have stayed at the same place in London when I visit in late May-early June. It's been suggested that I look for another place to stay in case that one doesn't work out. I confess I haven't really got a Plan B.

I would prefer to pay about £95 per night and be within 2-3 blocks of a Tube station. I need a refrigerator in my room as well. If anyone has suggestions, please let me know. (Disclaimer: I know about No. 63 the Soroptimist hotel, whose single rooms have been booked well in advance of my stay, year after year). Thanks!

EDIT: I just emailed the landlady of the place I usually stay. Although last year around this time I was able to make a reservation for the spring of 2023, she isn't taking any bookings until late November. This makes me a bit nervous, considering the above post. Am I being too fussy?

Posted by
2328 posts

Like a broken record, I always recommend booking.com. It is a great site to do research and then you can book through booking or go directly to the lodging site.

You. can choose features such as a kitchenette or even just a. refrigerator. You can choose neighborhood and close to tube. Definitely can choose budget.

Reviews are very helpful.

I know that members on this site love Premier Inns and have stayed at all of them from what I can tell. I expect that some of them might jump in and recommend one that meets your needs.

Posted by
1450 posts

Just bear in mind that at Premier Inn only the Premier Plus rooms have a fridge. These rooms are more expensive and not all hotels have them.

Posted by
742 posts

Thanks very much! I will look into booking.com for sure.

Posted by
28247 posts

I think finding a centrally located Premier Inn near a Tube station under £100 per night--even for a room that's not Premier Plus--will be a challenge, but rates seem lowest when booked well in advance, so it's definitely worth a look. You might get lucky, especially at one of the eastern locations. However, I think there are cheaper options than PI that aren't air-conditioned, if you can find one with a refrigerator. I very much appreciate having a mini-fridge, but I rarely end up with one in high-cost cities, because the sort of hotel that offers one seems to be a lot more expensive.

I have often thought that if I had a very long stay in a major city, it would be worth trying to get the hotel's permission to buy a mini-fridge locally and leave it behind when I check out.

Posted by
1394 posts

How many nights are you staying?

Maybe an appartment would be better for you. We usually use an appartment if we are staying three nights or more.

Posted by
4871 posts

I believe Rick's standard recommendation is the Knightsbridge area, which is awfully close to a lot of stuff.

Posted by
742 posts

For some strange reason, I am being emailed that there are replies to this post. When I follow the link, however, those replies are not visible to me.

This could mean, I suppose, that the posters have remove their replies. If not, should I contact a moderator?

Posted by
1305 posts

I think when someone makes an edit it updates the whole thread.

Posted by
767 posts

I added a reply then realised I was posting on the wrong thread so deleted it. That might be what you saw?

Posted by
742 posts

Golden Girl, your reply seemed appropriate since I was looking for a place to stay in London. You do have a good point about prices for rooms. Thanks very much!

Posted by
136 posts

Vincent House is a short walk from Notting Hill Gate, and rooms have mini-fridges. The price (as of the end of last year, when I stayed there) is slightly above your budget, but it also includes full breakfast.

Posted by
28247 posts

I've stayed at the Vincent House twice (and liked it), but not since 2018. I don't remember having a mini-fridge in my room, but I guess I might have forgotten. I also don't remember air conditioning, which might be slightly risky in June. My stays were in early September, and it was fine, but I remember thinking I might have a few unlucky days.

The breakfast buffet was always quite good, with a bit of day-to-day variation. I learned that it was smart to wander around and look at the offerings first; one day I filled my plate and only then noticed the bagels with cream cheese and smoked salmon.

Posted by
742 posts

acraven, thank you. I'm looking into Vincent House. So far it looks like a great deal.

Posted by
1232 posts

Knightsbridge is near some stuff but it’s quite a way from plenty more. For example it’s nowhere near St Paul’s, the Tower of London, the Globe, Tate Modern, the British Museum, the British Library etc. I would want to be quite a bit further east.

Posted by
9261 posts

Johnnew52 so what if Knightsbridge isn’t close to the “Sites.” Its a very nice neighborhood and via the Tube and/or busses the sites are reachable.

Last two trips I’ve stayed in the Richmond neighborhood which is a 25 minute tube ride into the city center. Didn’t care that I wasn’t near the sites.

Still enjoyed a service in Westminster Abbey, theatre and dining venues near Covent Garden. Great bus tube rides back to Richmond and a 25 minute walk to my hotel. Didn’t care it was after midnight. And I’m no Spring Chicken having been born when Truman was President.

Each to their own regarding where they chose to stay.

Posted by
1305 posts

I'd concur with Claudia. Knightsbridge is a good place for a tourist to find lodgings. There are plenty of places of interest within walking distance and getting to central London and it's sights is no problem. Same goes for High Street Kensington. As a local, it's a bit too posh for me to feel like I belong, but I'm a bit of a peasant.

As long as you're within walking distance of a tube station in zone 1 or 2 everywhere is in easy reach. Further out you're probably going to get somewhere where you have a neighbourhood with unique character. Remember, London is a series of ancient villages and towns all mashed together over time. Most places still retain some of their flavour that makes it so interesting.

Islington is somewhere that's rarely mentioned on the tourist trail, but Upper Street, Angel and the surrounds is an example of somewhere that's really pleasant but still is within easy reach of the sights in central London.

Posted by
464 posts

We liked the South Kensington area near the Gloucester Road tube station. There were a lot restaurants and grocery stores nearby, and it was very convenient to take the tube anywhere in London. We could walk to Kensington Gardens and also to the Victoria and Albert Museum as well from this area.

Posted by
1232 posts

Claudia - my post about Kensington not being central was a response to the poster earlier who stated that it’s close to many sites. If I didn’t know London, I would assume that meant that it was quite central.

I don’t have any problem with people who want to stay in Kensington if they want to but it’s definitely not central. As you say Richmond is even further out but it’s working for you as a base so great.

I spend most of my time in Forest Gate just to the east of Stratford so also a long way out but that’s where my son, daughter-in-law and now granddaughter live. I rarely even go into central London even though we spend maybe 1/4 of our time there now but the opening of the Elizabeth line means we can get in in minutes if we want to. Not to Kensington though!

Posted by
28247 posts

When you have a pretty limited budget in London, there are going to be compromises. Maybe you stay farther out. Maybe you settle for a place with
a rating of 6.8 on booking.com. Maybe you're at a 4-story B&B with no lift or air conditioning, etc.

My first compromise is on the decor. I'm OK with something furnished like a dorm room as long as it's clean and has reliable hot water and Wi-Fi. I try to stay out of costly cities like London during what I consider a/c season.

Posted by
742 posts

i usually do stay at a place with no air conditioning or lift. It's at least four stories, though I am on the second floor (first floor in the UK).

By further out, do you mean outside Zones 1 and 2?

Posted by
28247 posts

I wasn't thinking that specifically--I've just noticed in looking at the Premier Inn website that rates are substantially lower in parts of the city farther from the center. I don't know London well enough to identify areas that are farther out but offer advantages in addition to lower cost. I have enjoyed staying close enough to sights that I can walk back to my hotel in an hour or two at the end of the day, wandering through interesting neighborhoods. The farthest from central London I've ever stayed is the Vincent House in Nottinghill Gate.

Posted by
1305 posts

Further out could mean places like Richmond and Chiswick in the west / south west, Shoreditch or Hackney in the east, Hampstead or Highgate in the north. I'll let you take your chances in the south east (Peckham or Lewisham).

Posted by
9261 posts

Look at either the Richmond or Chiswick Premier Inns. I’ve stayed at both because I’ve done the
“Sites” more than once over decades of visits.

That and I enjoy seeing other neighborhoods like Ealing or Richmond or Chiswick.

I do go to theatre in London so used to taking the tube to and from the city center.

Latest walk back to a PI was after seeing Hamilton. Was staying at the Richmond PI which is a 25 minute stroll from the station. It was after midnight when I got back to the PI.

Next trip I hope to stay in Shoreditch or Clapham or Hammersmith. Then again might return to the Chiswick PI. Liked being able to walk along the Thames River Path and throughly enjoyed the small George and Devonshire pub run by the Fuller Brewery across the road. I also enjoyed great coffee at Marie’s Deli which I discovered as I walked towards Hammersmith bridge.

Over decades staying in different neighborhoods has been a great way to explore and experience London.

Posted by
1305 posts

Ealing is a pretty good shout. It has a good feel of being a separate little town with all the amenities you need, and you can have fun seeing local shops, cafes and pubs. Premier Inn there it seems is near Ealing Common for some green space, and within an easy walk of Ealing Broadway station for Central and District Line tube trains and the Elizabeth Line. Maybe a little more working class and demographically diverse than Richmond or Chiswick. Low room prices but of course cost and time of travel to central London is a factor possibly.

Premier Inn at Angel Islington is slightly more expensive. I'd rate Upper Street one of the best places for choice of affordable eating anywhere in London. There's a Northern Line tube station (longest escalator on the tube network) and a great bus service from Angel. I can walk to Piccadilly Circus from Angel in 25 minutes when I'm measuring a brisk walk on my Strava app.

Posted by
742 posts

I went to a movie near the Angel and Islington Tube station last May. It was at Screen on the Green--which I had not realized as the site of a famous Sex Pistols/Clash gig. Seemed like a nice area. We ate at a Mexican restaurant called Wahaca. Very good food.