I wrote out a big long question and someone replied, but my topic was deleted! Ugh. Anyway, lets see if I can remember what I said. I will be in London for a week and I would like to get out of the city for a day. No matter how many times I go back and forth, I can't decide between Oxford and Windsor Castle. So I thought, why not both? I googled this question to see if it is possible, and the consensus seems to be "no, you need a full day for each destination". So my question is why? I can see how it would be ideal to have a full day in Oxford, but do you really need more than about 3 hours to see Windsor Castle? WC opens at 9:30, lets say I get there a bit early to get in line. Train ride from London is about 40 minutes, get there early to get near the front of the line and see it at opening. Stay for about 3 hours max. Take the train from Windsor to Oxford (50-60 minutes). See the colleges and such until they close, then have dinner and explore the streets and architecture of the city until evening. Take the train from Oxford to London (60 minutes) and be back to my hotel at around 8:00. I realize that everyone has different travel preferences, but is there something I'm not considering that would make this trip a headache? I noticed that there is a Oxford/Stonehenge/Windsor coach tour, and that would be even more rushed with travel time and touring time eaten away in Stonehenge, but people seem to enjoy it. I wouldn't want to do Stonehenge, so Oxford and Windsor seem okay to me, but maybe it would be more tiring than I am imagining. Thoughts?
A side question, I am considering doing Buckingham Palace since I will be there in September. If I end up doing Windsor Castle, is it worth doing both? Would it be kind of redundant to do two royal residences in one weeklong trip? Should I chose one and use the time to do something completely different?