hello all - Full Disclosure: I posted this on the Scottish Forum too - looking for advice from both perspectives!
My wife and I will be coming to the UK in mid May. Our 4th time to England but our first trip to Scotland. We have 3 nights London, then train to Liverpool for the Pilgrimage (my 3rd visit to the birthplace of the Beatles) for another 3 nights. We then plan on renting a car and driving to Ambleside in the Lake District for 3 nights. We enjoy easy to moderate hikes, cultural activities and of course food (and pubs!!). We prefer smaller locally owned establishments. Regarding hiking, i'd say we can hike about 5 miles or so or up to 4 hours, given how strenuous the trail is. I don't like unprotected heights tho!
After Ambleside, we plan to drive into Scotland. We are thinking of visiting Glencoe and Pitlochry. I currently have penciled in 2 nights each locale. This would be followed by driving to Edinburgh, returning the car and having 3 nights in Edinburgh, before returning home.
My question is - ideally, I typically do not like less than 3 nights in any location – once you arrive, check in to the lodging and then with departing that final morning - doesn’t allow for too much time and we normally don’t like bobbing around or feeling rushed! Tho of course some areas may not warrant more than two nights.
My questions are:
-Keep the Lake District as is, (3 nights) with the 2 nights in each Glencoe and Pitlochry
-Skip the Lake District all together, giving us 3 additional nights in Scotland for a total of 10 nights (add to Glencoe and/or Pitlochry, Edinburgh or elsewhere - please be kind for me even suggesting skipping the LD!)
-Spend only 2 nights in the Lake District and add that night to either Glencoe or Pitlochry.
Thank you all!! Any and all advice welcomed!!!