Please sign in to post.

First time in London - hotel reccomendations

My wife and I are planning a 4 night trip to London in August. This is the first time for both of us and we're unfamiliar with the neighborhoods, where to stay and where to avoid. Budgeting $400-$500/night.

We'll certainly hit most of the biggest attractions, but don't necesarily want to be in the middle of the action. A quieter location but easily walkable to major sites if that makes sense.

Would love to hear area and hotel suggestions. Bonus if breakfast is included.

Thanks in advance for your help!

Posted by
5032 posts

There are many previous threads on this that you can access by entering London Hotels in the Search box. Here's a few to start:
https://search.ricksteves.com/?button=&date_range=1y&filter=Travel+Forum&query=London+hotel&utf8=%E2%9C%93

But just to note, London is really spread out, and there is no way to walk to all the sites usually desired by tourists. More important is to find a fairly central location that is very close to good transportation options (tube stations and bus stops). Google Maps can help with that.

Posted by
27342 posts

I don't stay in such nice hotels, so I'll leave the hotel recommendation to others. I want to point out, though, that London is a very large city with widely scattered sights. Westminster Abbey is 2.8 miles from the Tower of London. The Victoria and Albert Museum is 2.1 miles from the former and 4.7 miles from the latter. The British Museum is 1.5 miles from Westminster Abbey and considerably farther from the other sights I've mentioned. There is no location that I'd consider "easily walkable" from a lot of the major sights on a short visit like yours. You're almost certainly going to want to use the Underground and/or buses a good bit of the time, at least during the hours your target sights are open. Many of the top attractions in London are large and really time-consuming, so a leisurely one-hour walk from sight to sight may not be how you want to spend your time--though it would be an interesting walk.

I agree with the usual suggestion to stay within on the loop made by the Underground's Circle Line and to choose a hotel near an Underground station served by at least two lines. The latter characteristic will reduce the number of times you'll need to transfer, which can take quite a bit of extra time.

Since you're going to have to pick and choose among London's dozens of attractions, it would help those making hotel suggestions to know what places are must-see's for you, personally.

Posted by
8805 posts

Thats a nice sized budget for an expensive city.

Been going there since Nixon was in office.

Have seen the growth and evolvement.

Given your parameters consider the following properties:

The Guardsman Hotel 4 star in the Westminster neighborhood. Block and a 1/2 stroll to The Palace.
2 blocks to Parliament Square ( Parliament, Elizabeth’s Tower ( looking very spiffy after the restoration) and Westminster Abbey. Big Ben will toll on the hour.

The Royal Horseguards Hotel. 5 star. St James neighborhood. Next to the Thames. 25 minutes from the Palace. 20 from Parliament Square. Trafalgar Square and the National Gallery 10 minute Walk.

A third option The Chesterfield Mayfair. 20 minutes to the Palace and St James Park. 25 to Parliament Square.

Posted by
16672 posts

Since they do ask for a “walkable to major sites” I will heartily endorse Claudia’s suggestion of the Westminster/Whitehall area, and specifically the Royal Horseguards Hotel. I was going to suggest historic St. Ermin’s, near Westminster Abbey, which we enjoyed very much, but I have to admit I would prefer the location of the Royal Horseguards for one major reason which I will explain later. I will still post a link to St. Ermin’s so you can compare. It has a lot of history—-but so does the Royal Horseguards Hotel. August prices for both appear to be well within your budget.

https://www.sterminshotel.co.uk/

https://www.guoman.com/the-royal-horseguards

But first, to address the “walkable” idea. Yes, London is large, and the main attractions are quite scattered. However, for the usual suspects”, namely the Tower of London, St. Paul’s cathedral. Trafalgar Square, Covent Garden and the West End theatres, the British Museum, Churchill War Rooms, Westminster Abbey, Hyde and St.,James Parks, Buckingham Palace, the Kensington museums (Victoria and Albert, Science Museum, and Natural History Museum), and the South Bank sights such as the Tate Modern, Shakespeare’s Globe Theatre, and the National Theatre complex, this area of Westminster (or Whitehall) is actually “central”.

And it is not only possible but enjoyable to walk to each one of the places listed from a hotel in the location of the two suggested above. I know this because we have done it.

Yes, some of those walks will be 2.2- 2.5 miles. That is one hour of healthy outdoor activity. Something we much prefer, over riding underground in a crowded tube. Most of our London visits we avoid the Tube altogether.

For sights to the west of St. Ermin’s, we have a very nice route through the parks—St. James, with its lake and beautiful plantings, then Green Park, all lawn and trees, then Hyde Park, with the rose garden, large lake, and Princess Diana memorial fountain. For sights to the east, we cross the Thames** and use the very pleasant pedestrian Thames Path, with its great views across to classic London buildings. If the destination is on the north side of the river, such as St. Paul’s, we use the pedestrian-only Millennium Bridge to cross back, or, for the Tower of London, the iconic Tower Bridge which has a good pedestrian path well-separated from the traffic.

If for some reason we get far away on our walk and do not have time or energy to return on foot, we use the London double-decker buses, or a Thames commuter boat ( now called Uber boats) to return home, disembarking at Westminster Pier.

Here is a good schematic map of the London bus routes that connect the major attractions:

https://content.tfl.gov.uk/bus-route-maps/key-bus-routes-in-central-london.pdf

On our numerous trips to London over the past 20 years, we have walked as far as Greenwich to the east and Chelsea to the west, returning by boat in each case. London and Venice are our favorite European walking cities. I recommend you look closely at these or other Westminster hotels—-by which I mean not all of Westminster but specifically close to the river, and the Elizabeth Tower (aka Big Ben) or Whitehall.

** And now why I like the location of the Royal Horseguards Hotel even more than St. Ermin’s: we detest crossing the Westminster Bridge. It is way too crowded, and often blocked with throngs of people watching the scummy shell games. The bridge we like it the next one downriver. The Hungerford Bridge is a railway bridge, but it has separate pedestrian bridges, the Golden Jubilee bridges, on either side, making for a pleasant and scenic river crossing. One can even stop and take photos.

The Royal Horseguards hotel is right at the base of this bridge. Of course, one can access the pedestrian bridge from other hotels in Whitehall or Westminster, but this one makes it very convenient.

Posted by
2616 posts

You can get a lovely deluxe room at my favorite hotel, The Baileys--beautiful old building, quiet, excellent staff and services, very spiffy inside, charming traditional room decor, my room had both a tub and shower, very clean and comfy and just across the street from the Gloucester Rd tube station (served by the District, Circle and Piccadilly lines--Piccadilly will get you cheaply from & to Heathrow in about 40 minutes) in the Kensington area. Easy to walk to the V&A, Harrod's and plenty of restaurants nearby. They have a restaurant and breakfast is available.

Posted by
4 posts

We stayed at the Sanctuary House Hotel in the heart of Westminster, walkable to everything, and loved it.

Posted by
16672 posts

Sanctuary House is in the exact area I am recommending, on a nice quiet street and close to our favorite park, St. James. It was our first “go to” hotel in London when we started visiting regularly 20:years ago. It may not be luxurious enough for the OP, but it is certainly a good option for anyone looking for a friendly moderately priced hotel in London. Note that it is located above a Fullers pub, but that has never been a noise problem when we were there.

Posted by
16 posts

Thank you everyone for your feedback, especially Lola for your thorough rundown of sites to see within walking distance. I understand London is a large city most easily navigated by bus or tube, but we don't mind a mile or 2 walk to get to an area with a number of attractions. Finding a spot central to a variety of sites is what we're looking for.

The Sanctuary House is on our short list, great rec! We're not necessarily looking for luxury, just a nice, quiet place with king beds and the option for breakfast at the hotel.

Posted by
22 posts

The Sanctuary House has been closed for the past few months for refurbishment. It reopens on May 5, so it may still feel new in August.

Posted by
4528 posts

The Chesterfield Mayfair was mentioned, this is an OK hotel in a very convenient part of town. It's easy to walk to all kinds of stuff that you will want to see and there's a Tube station right next to the Ritz.

The rooms are smallish and are decorated as if you're visiting Lord Salisbury at his country estate. Lobby is also small, the dining room is pleasant and the food is good.

I suppose if you head a bit west there is Hyde Park corner which had some hotels and might be a bit cheaper.

Posted by
16672 posts

If you do choose Sanctuary House, there is shortcut to St. James Park to use for walking to that and other parks, Buckingham Palace, Churchill War Rooms, and Whitehall Place which leads to the Golden Jubilee pedestrian bridge. Simply take Dartmouth St. north from the hotel to the Cockpit Steps, and you are there.

As for breakfast, when we last stayed there, they offered a choice: have a light but decent Continental breakfast included with the room, or pay a bit extra for a “full English”. I do not know if they still do, but if so, it is nice to have a choice. We are light eaters at breakfast (at home we both have cold cereal and coffee or tea)and we were happy with the Continental.

Posted by
214 posts

I have a new philosophy: I stay near Heathrow for the first night, using the early check in option - there are a lot of very reasonably priced places on Bath Road and the general area. All I want to do is sleep when i arrive, and can't stand fooling around getting downtown with my bag when I am myself bagged. The hotel staff might have ideas too. The next AM I am fresh as can be and ready to move downtown... Consider that the cost of a taxi, if you don't want to get the bus that comes every 20 minutes, and costs about 2 pounds now, plus the cost of a decent airport hotel, is still cheaper than one night at a downtown place, you use only for sleeping the first day anyways.

Posted by
22 posts

Staying at Heathrow might make sense if you take a morning flight out of the US and arrive at Heathrow at night. But if you fly out at night and arrive at Heathrow at, say, 9AM, you do kind of waste a day of your vacation by remaining at Heathrow for 24 hours.

Posted by
27342 posts

I've never stayed at Heathrow on arrival day; it has been many decades since I began a trip in London as opposed to ending one there. However, for those of us who know 100% that we'll be totally non-functional on arrival day, it's not a bad idea to consider one night at the perfectly nice Premier Inn attached to Terminal 4 where I've stayed for around 60 GBP (possibly a bit higher now; I last stayed there in 2018) before outbound flights. Especially in the summer when you'd be looking for an air-conditioned room (not available at a bargain price in a good downtown location that I know of), the T4 PI can save a lot of money when compared to costs in downtown London.

Posted by
16672 posts

The usual advice for recovering from jet lag and quickly adjusting to local time is to go outside and get some daylight. There is a scientific basis for this; the daylight entering one’s eyes has an effect on the brain center and hormone systems that regulate circadian rhythms through the pineal gland.

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/jet-lag/symptoms-causes/syc-20374027#:~:text=Properly%20time%20bright%20light%20exposure,to%20an%20earlier%20time%20zone.

So while a quick nap might be refreshing after a sleepless night on the plane, it is best for most people to get outside as much as possible for exercise and daylight, rather than sleeping indoors all day. Then have an early dinner and head to bed around 9 pm local time.

Posted by
15532 posts

I now spend my first night at Heathrow. But my plane lands between 9 and 10 PM. If you are on a flight that lands in the morning, don't stay at Heathrow. Once you clear immigration and customs, you could be in London in less than an hour.

And, more than likely, your hotel room at Heathrow wont be ready until early afternoon.

Posted by
8 posts

hello- If traveling by Tube, I have found a great tip is to stay on a direct line to LHR. We last stayed in a little, midrange boutique hotle in Earl's Court. We loved it. -G

Posted by
7389 posts

Thank you, Lola & others for your details for walking routes. We’re staying at a less expensive hotel while in London - the Premier Hub at Westminster (chose to spend $$ for great hotels at smaller cities), and your details are appreciated!