Please sign in to post.

Day Trip from London: Brussels or York?

My mom and I are taking our third trip to Europe in November/December (25 days). We'll be visiting Rome, Orvieto, Florence, Siena, Padua, Venice, Paris, Strasbourg and London.

We have a tour credit with Golden Tours for booking through Costco and would like to use that credit to take a day trip (solo without a tour guide - it's basically just a train ticket with a 1 day hop-on-hop-off bus included). We can't decide between a day trip to York or Brussels. I think York is around 2 hours away and Brussels is 2.5 hours via Eurostar.

We will be looking at going on our day trip around December 20, so it would be right in the heart of Christmas Market season. And we'd be spending around 10 hours in either city. Which would you guys recommend?

(I went to Brussels for only 4 hours back in 1997, but my mom has never been. Neither of us has been to York. Our interests: history, museums, great food)

Posted by
10294 posts

York, even though I've never been. With all that traveling, even though train time may be similarz, boarding and checking in for Eurostar is more involved and includes immigration controls in both ends, requiring way more time at the station on each end. York should be interesting and beautiful at Chtistmastime.

Posted by
8329 posts

Brussels is OK, but not really the knock your socks off European capital. No way would I send five hours traveling to go there from London.

We are going to York on our four week drive tour of England and Wales this October. We have three nights in York and will not see it all. On a day trip like you are suggesting, you would at best get half a day in York.

I suggest going somewhere closer like Cambridge, Canterbury, Salisbury, Bath/Stonehenge, or Oxford.

Posted by
7941 posts

I've been to both cities, and neither is worth 5 hours travel for a 10 hour visit. Neither is noted for their stupendous Christmas Markets or fine food. Are there any other options, like Bath, that's not so far? You are doing a tremendous amount of travel already. Can they get you from Strasbourg to Germany, where you might find an authentic Christmas Market, one not filled with Polish and Chinese merchandise?

The train to Brussels stops at Midi station, where you get a free transfer to many trains to Centraal, where the tourism starts. You have to reverse that on departure. York is quite different, perhaps even more touristy. Consider the rail museum and the nearby 1190 Massacre monument if you have time.

Posted by
11294 posts

Overall, Brussels is quite uninspiring. They do have the Royal Museum of Fine Arts (my sister-in-law had always wanted to see some specific pieces there, so this was a must for her). And I loved my Art Nouveau tour with ARAU - see if they have anything on your dates: http://www.arau.org/en

Otherwise, go anywhere else! York has a lot to fill a day (look at Rick's England or Great Britain book for some ideas, or Tripadvisor's list of sights: https://www.tripadvisor.com/Attractions-g186346-Activities-York_North_Yorkshire_England.html#ATTRACTION_SORT_WRAPPER)

Posted by
6713 posts

If you have to choose between Brussels and York, then I'd say York, for all the reasons given above. Does your Costco deal limit you to a day trip, or are you choosing not to spend a night there? I think York is worth an overnight if your schedule allows.

If your Costco deal is more flexible about where you can go, and you have only one day, then I'd suggest a closer destination like Oxford or Cambridge or Canterbury or Salisbury. Four hours is a long time to be on a train for a day's visit.

Posted by
4535 posts

First, I have to say Brussels is unfairly getting dissed here. It is a very lovely city and worth spending a few days in. I would rank it ahead of some other cities in Europe, but that is personal taste.

However, there are two very good reasons not to choose it per your options. The first has been noted - that the time there and back, plus the extra security and passport control review would mean a lot of wasted time just to go for a few hours. The second, and almost as important, is that Brussel's charms are best during good weather. The Grand Place and the lovely neighborhoods are best explored when the weather is nice and the days are long - not in the middle of winter. Brussels lacks the big name museums some other cities have (perhaps the reason why all the negative reviews). So there isn't as much to do in winter.

York would make for a better option, although I agree that a closer city to London would be better in winter when days are short. But a few hours walking around town, seeing the main sites and having some good pub grub would be a nice day. I would check to see what types of Christmas events might be going on that you might partake while there. Plan on staying late if there is an evening Christmas concert or event and just take a late train (it'll be dark anyway).

Posted by
330 posts

Lindsay,
Since you have that credit, here are my thoughts.
Lots to see there, I especially love the York Minster Cathedral.

It was fun getting lots in the little lanes. Enjoyed having tea there too.
I don't know if they have a specific Christmas Market, but I think it could be
fun to look around.
I went to a few in London (Christmas markets/faire). Found some fun
food to snack on and a couple of small items to take home as gifts.

Brussels is nice too.

You said your interests are history, museums, and food.
Then, maybe Brussels is for you then. Many museums, great food too.

They do have a Christmas Market there.

Personally, I would pick Brussels because of the many types of museums.

Whatever you decide will be fun for the two of you.
Enjoy!