Hi!
We're planning 2 weeks in Britain in July. We includes my husband, myself & two kids ages, 10 & 7. First week will be in London w/friends, but hitting all the big tourist sites. (It will be the first international trip for our kids.) We won't get to it all, but we will get to a lot. It's the 2nd week I'm torn about. Was planning on:
2 nights Cardiff
2 nights Brecon Beacons
2 nights Warwick
And ran out of time....
Then got to thinking it might be better to do:
1 night Warwick/Stratford-upon-Avon (2 days = Mary Arden's Farm, maybe some other Shakespeare stuff & Warwick Castle)
2 nights Lake District
3 nights Edinburgh
There is a strong focus on trying to do stuff that the kids will be interested in. (If they aren't happy, no one will be right?) My husband has interest in Scotland, as it's his ancestry, but doesn't have a specific must do. And it will be the only place, so far, on this trip where I haven't been before. Lake District was recommended by friends who went last summer. They have kids the same age & said Lake District was great for all the activities w/the kids. Plus, quintessential country England. I read about Mary Arden's Farm & Warwick in ETTBD & both sound like things our kids would enjoy. Plus, we get a little history in there too. I feel like I'm trying to get too much in, am I? Of note: husband leaves at end of this 2 weeks, girls & I will continue on. We will be heading toward Paris & somewhere else. I have a post on the General Europe board about that, as I'm overwhelmed w/choices & not enough time. If the girls and I decided we wanted to go back & spend more time somewhere we totally could.
What do you think?
Jill