Please sign in to post.

Where to stay in London

Hello! My husband and I are travling to London at the end of march with a couple of friends. We are only in town for 4 days. We have a couple places booked and are trying to decide which one is better. One is by Kingscross station/Euston because we plan to be using the trains and busses a lot. There are two more- one is between Shoreditch and Bethnel green. The last one is in Kennington. As none of us have been to London before we would love opinions on which area's are the best.

Posted by
8989 posts

It is always important to look at proximity to transport when visiting London. If you have access (can walk there in about 5 minutes) to a tube station that makes a huge difference. I would focus on locations with good transport options as close to the center of London as you can afford.

Posted by
834 posts

Of those locations, the area around Kings Cross & Euston is the most central by far and would be my choice.

However it would be useful to know a bit more context - nearer Euston or Kings Cross? South of Euston Road and therefore in Bloomsbury? Or further north? Etc.

Posted by
3 posts

The one is off of kings cross road- not far from Clerkenwell, I think. it's really close to Percy Circus garden!

Posted by
834 posts

The one is off of kings cross road- not far from Clerkenwell, I think. it's really close to Percy Circus garden!

Oh, is it a Travelodge that used to be called something like the Royal Scot Hotel? Because that was always known as an absolute dive used only by budget coach trips. It may be better now but please check reviews carefully!

That area is okay, bit rough round the edges but nice and close to Kings Cross for trains and buses. Would I be right I guessing that you’re on a tight accommodation budget?

I actually lived very close to Percy Circus as a student way back in the mid-80s. It’s a decent area but not the most obvious tourist area.

Posted by
3 posts

Actually- we have an airbnb right there. So it is a little nicer than a budget hotel/motel. We just wanted to be close to nice, transportation as we might be going out of the city a bit for day trips and wanted to be closer to a bigger station. Thanks for all the help!

Posted by
28505 posts

In case you are not aware, you don't necessarily have a choice about which London train station you use for an out-of-town trip that is beyond the reach of the Underground (subway) system. Different destinations are served by different London train stations, though for some destinations served by multiple rail companies you may have more than one option. To find out which London station(s) you'd need to depart from for a particular side trip, go to this website: https://www.nationalrail.co.uk/, enter London (All stations) in the "Departing from" block and the town you anticipate traveling to in the "Going to" block. Choose a date (best to match the day of the week on which you plan to travel, if you know that) and a time consistent with your plans, then click on "Get times and prices". The actual London departure station will be shown for each train.

Don't freak out too much about the prices if you've chosen a date in the immediate future. UK rail fares can be painfully high if you buy the tickets on or close to the date of travel, but you can usually save quite a bit of money by buying in advance. Just pay attention to the change/refund rules.

Posted by
8473 posts

We just wanted to be close to nice, transportation as we might be going out of the city a bit for day trips and wanted to be closer to a bigger station.

I would strongly suggest that when you have your day trips figured out, you come back here to the forum and ask for more specific advice about trains (for example, We're going to Windsor Castle on a Thursday in June and would like to know the best and cheapest way to get there from Kings Cross Station... and so on).

There are many people who can give you information on train travel, the best time to buy, the best place to buy and so on. I saved a lot of money earlier this year by listening to the forum members here when it came to train travel.

Posted by
8505 posts

Oh, is it a Travelodge that used to be called something like the Royal Scot Hotel? Because that was always known as an absolute dive used only by budget coach trips.

Gosh, that's a real blast from the distant past. British Rail (before privatisation) used to do rail inclusive holidays (they were called Golden Rail or something like that) and I stayed there once. It is a nice enough building from the outside, but totally agree it was a bit of a dive. Probably the worst hotel I've ever stayed in. I hope Travelodge have given the building a lot of sorely needed investment.

Posted by
23671 posts

If you had asked without the two references, we would have recommended the Victoria Station area. Over the years this is our go to area. On the last three trips we have used the Hotel Best Western - Victoria Station. The annex is a little less expensive.

Posted by
8371 posts

We are now staying at the Premier Inn Paddington Basin which is just a couple of hundred yards NE of Paddington Station where the Heathrow Express arrives from the airport in 15 minutes. The new Elizabeth Line also goes there from the airport.

It's just a short distance from the north end of Hyde Park, Bayswater and Kingsbridge too. Restaurants are all around the train station, and you can catch the Underground there to get anywhere in town fast.

Posted by
306 posts

Kind of off topic, but since none of you have been to London before, have you given any thought to all the things you can see and do in London itself? There's so much history and things to see, including a tour of Parliament, the interior of St. Paul's Cathedral and Westminster Cathedral, a day trip to Greenwich, Tower of London, a walking tour geared to particular interests that points out the historical points and just absorbing the sights and atmosphere, all the wonderful museums (British museum, National Gallery, Victoria & Albert, etc) and possibly going to a play or 2. Or if your heart is set on going outside the city, be sure to leave time to explore London itself.

Posted by
457 posts

Westminster Cathedral,

I would swap out for Westminster Abbey in terms of interiors, age (800+ years older) and historical significance, unless there is a religious reason for choosing the Cathedral over the Abbey.

Posted by
8473 posts

Camborne, I'm wondering maybe if Plumaria meant to write Westminster Abbey. Usually that's linked a lot with St. Paul, and it could have been a slip of the pen. But if not, I agree with you—the Abbey wins hands down.

Posted by
34355 posts

I don't know, people visit Methodist Central Hall. People visit Westminster Cathedral. Some visit Westminster Abbey

Posted by
153 posts

Last May 2024 we stayed at The Montague at the Garden, around the corner from the British Museum. We chose this place for accommodation and walking to different parts of London, the British Museum , Covet Garden, all new areas from any of our previous visits to London. We are in our early 70’s and we especially enjoyed walking to most everywhere, Harrods, Churchill War Rooms, and down to the water for a short trip to Greenwich. The breakfast in the Montague in our opinion was expensive £30 per person. There were lots of nice cafes around for more interesting meals.