With only the a little over two days in Copenhagen should I consider taking the train over the border to Sweden one day or just stay in Copenhagen?
What are the main things not to be missed with limited time to tour?
Posted by
Uppsala, Sweden
6968 posts
No, with only two days you should stay in Copenhagen. A city that deserves more time than that.
Posted by
Washington DC
28052 posts
Rick's top picks for Copenhagen can be found on this very website. Go here:
https://www.ricksteves.com/europe/denmark/copenhagen and click on At a Glance.
Posted by
OP
62 posts
Thank you! I think the wise choice will be to stay in Copenhagen. It's hard being so close to Sweden and not make a visit there but time goes so fast and with so much to see and do in Copenhagen I'll resist the pull to check another country off my list.
Posted by
TX, USA
4803 posts
Yes, definitely stay in Copenhagen. Although there are a lot of options, things I particularly enjoyed were Rosenborg Castle, a canal boat ride, and wandering Tivoli.
Posted by
OP
62 posts
Thank you! I have decided to stick with Copenhagen and the things you mentioned are at the top of my list!
Posted by
Uppsala, Sweden
6968 posts
Good plan! As much as I think visiting Sweden is a good idea, you really don't have time for it.
Posted by
TX, USA
4803 posts
I know exactly what you mean. When I DID go to Stockholm and Copenhagen, I had to fight the urge to go to Norway - but knew it needed (for me) an extended time. :)