I am trying to split 14 days between Denmark & Sweden. After some research I am wondering if it is a better idea to concentrate on Denmark, and for Sweden, allocate all the time to Stockholm. Reason for that is, Denmark seems to be lot more compact than Sweden. Instead of spreading myself thin sampling some towns in Denmark & Sweden each, would I be missing out much if I gave up visits to the smaller towns in Sweden & distributed that time between Copenhagen, Aarhus, Odense, Aero? Perhaps, 2 days in Aero, 1 in Odense, 2 in Aarhus, 4 in Copenhagen, 5 in Stockholm (with perhaps a day trip to Uppsala)? Is there a distinctive Swedish town/experience that I would be missing out here?
I did look into spending 2-3 days in Visby. But am giving up on the idea because perhaps there is an overlap between Visby & Aero; Visby is somewhat time-consuming to get to; also, the island of Gotland doesn't seem easy to traverse using just the public transportation which I would be reliant on.
What do you think? Any insight would be highly appreciated!