Please sign in to post.

500th Anniversary of Prussia adopting Lutheranism (tl;dr -- it was all about the money)

I meant to post this earlier but got sidetracked until now:

On 10 December 1525, at their session in Königsberg, the Prussian estates established the Lutheran Church in Ducal Prussia by deciding the Kirchenordnung, the general ecclesiastical constitution of a State Church.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_Order_(Lutheran)

Different Prussian holders of the privilege of minting official money committed to issue a Prussian currency of standardized quality, had debased the coins and expanded their circulation in order to finance the wars between Poland and Teutonic Prussia. However, this expansion disturbed the equilibrium of coins circulated to the volume of contractual obligations, only coming down due to a harsh depreciation of all existing nominally fixed contractual obligations by inflating all other non-fixed prices measured by these coins, ending only once the purchasing power of every extra issued coin equalled its material and production costs.

Understanding this important bit of state/aristocratic economic history (which I lifted from wikipedia) sheds a very important light on how Martin Luther described the need to shift away from the Church in Rome and develop a new one that had less (or different) ritual pomp and circumstance.

Luther wrote, in his usual logorrheic manner, that "this and all other forms were to be used in a manner that where they gave rise to a misuse they should be forthwith set aside, and a new form be made ready; since outward forms are intended to serve to the advancement of faith and love, and not to the detriment of faith.
Where they ceased to do the above, they are already dead and void, and are of no more value; just as when a good coin is debased, sad or retired on account of its abuse, and issued anew; or when everyday shoes wax old and rub, they are no longer worn, but thrown away and new ones bought.
The form is an external thing, be it ever so good, and thus it may lapse into misuse; but then it is no longer an orderly form, but a disorder; so that no external order stands and avails itself, as hitherto the papal forms are judged to have done, but all forms have their life's worth, strength, and virtues in proper use; or else they are of no value whatsoever" (Werke, Weimar ed., xix. 72 aqq.).

So, contemporary Protestant theologians/scholars read Luther as teaching about putting the spirit before the letter and not continuing with the debased ritual practices of the established Church. But those readings are mostly wrong. Luther was not being metaphorical; he was literally warning people about the economy and the need to reorganize the minting of money.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prussian_estates

Lutherans themselves did not begin to use the term Lutheran until the middle of the 16th century, in order to distinguish themselves from other groups such as the Anabaptists and the Reformed (Calvinist) tradition. When doctors/dons of the Church (Roman) used the word earlier it was as a heresy, the same way that other heretical doctrines were named after a prominent proponent, like Marcionism or Nestorianism (or more recently, Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses).

When Pope Benedict XVI was still Cardinal Ratzinger, he mostly let Protestants off the hook for the sake of neighborly relations. Here's a nice paragraph by him praising the value of certain Protestant insights:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heresy_in_the_Catholic_Church#Modern_Roman_Catholic_response_to_Protestantism

Posted by
551 posts

Logorrheic?.... first time i've come across this on RS Forum. Good word though, love the quality of the discourse.
Keep 'em comin' Aviro. Brad

Posted by
4319 posts

Not understanding how this is relevant for travelers but I strongly disagree on the "money part" of this thread's title. Moreover at 1525 was the Prussia not existing that most people have in mind; and "Lutheranism" was not existing at this time in the way you seem to mean it - just 8 years after publishing disputation. History is seldomly an exact date when it comes to -isms in development process.

The area you seem to mean was not Mark Brandenburg - you mean Herzogtum Preußen around Königsberg (today Kaliningrad), correct? The last one was created by transformation of the rest of the Deutschorden and spritually they decided to accept reformation because the former relation to Catholic house Habsburg was broken because they had new multiple contract layers with Jagiellonen - the line of later Polish kings. Their decision towards reformation seems to be more differentiation as well as the spiritual middle finger against this new Catholic connection. By the way: neither Karl V (Habsburger) nor the Pope accepted the Treaty of Kraków.

About Luther: I think the best way to start understanding (Dr.) Martin Luther is to read his "Disputatio pro declaratione virtutis indulgentiarum", also known as 95 theses. Background: the interpretation of the bible was his academic scope.

Luther's original intention was not to found a counter-church but to re-form the at these times existing church and practices. Nothing more - and nothing less. Maybe this is a reason why he had no word for a "new" church. And we all know that he was not alone with this. And he knew as well and listed all and described the Christian instances and various orders. Later literature added also illustrations.

He was strongly referencing to four puristic principles which put a huge question mark on the role of Christian church between god and the people, and especially more on the sale of indulgences practiced at that time - basically "why to pay for something that cannot and need not to be bought":

  • solus Christus
  • sola gratia
  • sola fide
  • sola scriptura

A more silent fifth principle was the two kingdoms doctrine: to differentiate between and to separate the Church and the existing world order. Luther distinguished between the spiritual kingdom (God's word) and the secular kingdom (laws and authority), in which Christians live as members of both spheres.

Rulers in central Europe at the end of the Medieval Age (see map of 1500) had now two options:

  • support this doctrine to have a clear line between church and own regency
  • ban this doctrine when you are leader of both in your country to protect the extent of own power

Very simple decision - better: no real decision needed - for Herzogtum Preußen, Mark Brandenburg and most smaller properties / empires (not under control of house Habsburg) with rulers that had no spiritual leadership. Therefore as mentioned more at the top I do not see money as the main driver in this without saying that it was unimportant but Prussian estates (Herzogtum Preußen) had a different financial issue around this time after four years of war which were just the final after centuries of conflicts between Deutschorden and Kingdom of Poland.

About the money issue I see just a basic pragmatic principle for European rulers: less share of people's wallet for the church, more for the kingdom and me.

I like to end my post here although more to add to this interesting exchange - but this is not a history forum.

Posted by
3276 posts

Of course there are complex cultural contexts for our understandings of history, and those contexts don't overlap cleanly between members of this Forum. Just as well, yes?

To address the issue/concern of this OP to travel and travelers, let me then make it as explicit as possible that visits to Germany and Italy and Poland (and every other country where the Roman Church had a presence 500 years ago) are enriched by having some awareness of how church and state, religion and politics, brahmins and kshatriyas, got along with one another. The street plans and paving stones under your feet, the decorated facades above your heads, the names of the buildings and plazas, all transmit clues and memories of who held sway over whom and who served whom, during the rise of modern nation states.

Posted by
831 posts

"...are enriched by having some awareness of how church and state, religion and politics, brahmins and kshatriyas, got along with one another."

"The more you know, the more you see" as I've heard before. Too true.

Thanks Mark. Good to hear it wasn't (all) about the money.

Posted by
4319 posts

avirosemail, I fully agree that history and culture backgrounds and sights are very important for travelers and locals.

Most European countries have multiple layers of history and former regency areas do seldomly match with today's borders. And the more we look back into history with wars, deaths, pains, discrimination and displacement, the more Europeans can be proud to have achieved today's status of widely peace, respect, co-existence, collaboration and understanding of nations. To keep the manifold of cultures and to form multilateral agreements such as the EU, a common currency, or Schengen are remarkable achievements of our times which are imo too seldomly recognized and honored. I think travelers of the future might have a larger interest on this.

A good example of a forgotten achievement is the 50th anniversary of the Helsinki Declaration, the closing meeting of the third phase of the Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe (CSCE). What a historic moment for Europe after decades and centuries of war. But travelers seem more interested in the war(s). Another great moment for Europe was and still is Nov 9, 1989 when the Berlin Wall was opened. I still have tears and goosebumps remembering my night and the following days of these times.

Back to reformation which also was a real change, not only in but also for Europe. But historic change can be in detail not only positive. I like to mention with Kloster Ihlow a place off-the-beaten tourist paths which shows remembrance in a special way for a monastery church built in 1228 which was destroyed in 1529: the special reconstruction of the former Cistercian abbey "Schola Deï" ("School of God") close to Emden (Germany). The details can be read by everybody from this forum on their website which is - far from international tourist streams - already translated into English:
https://www.kloster-ihlow.de/en/.

Not far away is another undervalued place / phase of history: the Upstalsboom near Aurich. But not yet, not here.

Posted by
2648 posts

On 10 December 1525, at their session in Königsberg, the Prussian estates established the Lutheran Church in Ducal Prussia

First of all, please note: This church ordinance applied to the Duchy of Prussia, which was not part of the Holy Roman Empire. Rather it was the Brandenburg church ordinance of 1540 (written according to the model of the Brandenburg-Ansbach and Nuremberg Order of 1533) that set the standard: it applied in all Brandenburg territories (including secondary territories) and in the imperial city of Nuremberg, after which it was adopted by most Reformed imperial cities. So the “anniversary” will have to wait a little longer.

Secondly, I'm afraid it's completely wrong to say that Luther was “not being metaphorical” here. He is using the classic form of comparison, in which the primum comparandum is the old church order, which is compared to a devalued coin; the coin merely serves as the tertium comparationis. If we overlook this, we could as well assume that his second comparison indicates that he wanted to enter the international shoe trade. ;)

Thirdly, I would like to warn against judging Luther's “logorrheic manner” on the basis of an English translation. Could you please take a look at the original passage (WA 6, pp. 456,33–457,5: "An den Christlichen Adel Deutscher Nation", 1520); then we could discuss whether his style here corresponds to the standard of contemporary humanistic rhetoric or not (and, of course, what principles would have to apply for an appropriate translation into a modern language).

Nonetheless: Thank you for commemorating that date.

Posted by
3276 posts

Thanks for adding the book recommendation here in the recommended reading part of the forum.

Thanks also to the comments that expanded upon my brief, simplified ( = tl;dr ) note about the importance of economic history in the early years of the Reformation.

For more reading on economic history in Europe and the underpinnings of modern capitalism, see renowned author Albert O. Hirschman (of Exit, Voice, and Loyalty fame) for his less well-known but just as insightful book

The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph

Hirschman was a key figure in modern economic history of Europe, and the Passions book helped to update our understanding regarding the roots of capitalism. Yet another German Jewish-baptized-as-Lutheran scholar who escaped to the Institute of Advanced Study in New Jersey and changed the trajectory of his discipline.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_O._Hirschman

https://www.amazon.com/Passions-Interests-Political-Arguments-Capitalism/dp/0691160252/ref=sr_1_1?

You may also want to revisit Max Weber's "The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism" through a more recent edition with commentary that reflects modern scholarship.

This book studies the social conditions which made possible the development of capitalist civilization. The book analyzes the connection between the spread of Calvinism and a new attitude toward the pursuit of wealth in post-Reformation Europe and England, an attitude which permitted, encouraged--even sanctified--the quest for prosperity.

The best recent translation is this one (some say):
https://www.amazon.com/Protestant-Ethic-Spirit-Capitalism/dp/0199747253/ref=sr_1_2?

For you travel trivia fans, note that Max Weber was born in Erfurt, the same town where Martin Luther served as a monk.